WoWS Q&A – 28th January 2017

Source: Reddit, Sub_Octavian

Q: Are there any mods that you guys are considering adding to the base game? The ones I appreciate the most are ship names on the minimap and ship names next to player names in chat. A:Yes there are, including ship names on minimap. Watch the news!:)

Q: Any updates on replay functionality?

A: It is not low priority – it is planned and even worked on. But it won’t come very soon, as we aim at quite rich functionality of replays.

Q: Question regarding Radar mechanics.

A: With the exception of Missouri, Radar is purely cruiser option. We don’t want to add cruiser – DD counter. That would be cruiser nerf, which is currently not desirable.

Q: Question regarding performance of German destroyers.

A: It is too early to make conclusions, but our preliminary opinion: they are fine. Not as peculiar as RN CLs. Not as straight-powerful as KM BBs. This is a fine line, seems more or less balanced, but perhaps it lacks “wow!!!”. We will continue observing it. The stats on mid and high tier are not settled yet.

Q: […] Are there plans to extend this to other cruisers in order to make them more forgiving to play […] ?

A: There are no such plans now. This heal is a part of unique gameplay style, specific to RN. Other lines have their own features. We’d rather not make them all the same.

Q 1: Does Adrenaline Rush reduce loading time by 0.1% for each 1% hp missing or is it 0.2%? PTS2 had it at 0.2%

A 1: 0.2%. Typo here

Q 2: Does Adrenaline Rush affect ALL armament of the ship? Such as Secondaries, Torpedoes and AA as well as Primary battery? If not, exactly what armament gets affected by it?

A 2: Torpedoes and Primary for now. No AA. No Secondaries (we plan to add secondaries soon, though).

Q 3: Adrenaline Rush bonuses only care about missing HP, right? So if I heal with Repair Party, I will be losing some of the Adrenaline Rush bonuses?

A 3: Correct.

Q: Question (rather complaint) regarding Bastion mode.

A: Bastion chance is currently reduced, and in 0.6.1 the mode will be tweaked. We would like to make it more enjoyable instead of removing it.

Q 1: The destroyer damage build is somewhat weaker than pre-patch (e.g. DE power level reduction) and survivability has been indirectly nerfed through the implementation of new tools (e.g. RPF) to hunt DDs. Is there a plan to offset this power level reduction elsewhere?

A 1: The choice is here not only for DD captains. We wanted to make BB builds more specific with Aux guns, AA and Survival as main directions. General purpose builds are still viable, but we expect them to be less efficient. We would like to see more diversity in BB gameplay with these changes.

Q 2: On a related note, as someone who enjoys DDs, CL/CAs, and BBs, I’m a little nervous about the direction of BBs right now. Is there any thought about the power level of BBs and what might be necessary to bring CL/CAs back to the fore a bit?

A 2: We’re nervous about BB population growth, too. I have to say, I reviewed this last week. The growth is slowing down (which is good), but not that fast, so It is hard to tell right now whether we will see some healthy (for the meta) decline a bit later. Actually, we hope 0.6.0 will contribute here in a positive way. We also have some options in testing, if this tendency does not change.

Q 1: Question regarding changes to Expert loader

A 1: We did not change anything here, it worked as it did before. I guess there is typo, because “will now work” clearly implies that something changed.

Q 2: Question about Emergency Takeoff being rather expensive.

A 2: The penalty applies only when you’re on fire. If you are not on fire, you have standard cooldown. And without this skill, you won’t be able to launch anything while on fire anyways. It is useful if you play in close formation and often take damage.

Q 3: Inertia Fuse for HE Shells: Does the 50% penalty during retraining only affect the better penetration of the HE shells or does it also affect the reduced chance for fire?

A 3: Only the better penetration (it should, I will double check that tomorrow)

Q 4: Inertia Fuse for HE Shells: Will you add an explanaition in the game how caliber vs armor works, so people can actually make a choice with that knowledge in mind?

A 4: Hopefully, we will do it sometime.

Q 5: Dogfighting Expert: Why is it still saying that it improves average damage vs planes of different tier when we have mirror matchmaking for CVs for more than a year now?

A 5: On low tier there can be 2 CVs per team, so it still works there.

Q 6: Expert Rear Gunner: Why on earth was the point cost increased / doubled? Do you actually think it’s worth spending two skillpoints, even if the enemy Carrier captain did not know about strafing?

A 6: You would be surprised, but lots of players don’t use strafing because they haven’t mastered it yet.

Q 7: Evasive Maneuver Just to clarify: The moment I hit the ‘F’ button the planes will activate that skill? So if I choose to send them near my carrier manually without hitting that button, they will retain their normal behaviour (read: keep their speed and HP)?

A 7: Yes.

Q 8: Regarding the new captain XP curve, why did you make it harder for newer captains to advance in ranks while make it easier for higher ranked captains to advance in ranks? I would have assumed that you’d want to make it a tad easier for captains with less points, so they are not as much at a disatvantage versus players with more captain skills.

A 8: We do care about new players, but even with that, previous XP curve was way too unbalanced. You got new points like crazy in the first ranks, and then it got too tiresome.

Q 9: “Air Groups Modification 2” upgrade will now increase fighter ammunition count by 50%. Combine that with Dogfight expert and I can see US CVs with AS loadouts where the fighters will have to rearm very rarely. Is this intentional?

A 9: Yes.

Q 1: HEAP – Are we gonna see the penetration stats of different ships and shell types in future? So with HEAP, some Battleships might citadel cruisers like Edinburgh, etc. with HE right?

A 1: Hopefully it will be added to port information! As for now, HE peneatration is 1/6 of caliber, with the only exception is KM BB main caliber – there, it is 1/4. So HEAP is going to make sense for Akizuki (+penetrating DD plating), 127-130 mm guns (+penetrating mid tier BB plating and high tier Cruiser plating) and 150-180 mm guns (+penetrating high tier BB plating). It is almost useless on BBs (I would try it on KM BB for aux gun penetration, but this sacrifice of fire chance..I don’t know, really).

Q 2: Are you planning to bring an alternative line to IJN Torpedo boats? There are plenty ships with gunpower at DD class atm, i think what makes DDs interesting is torpeedos.

A 2: There will be other torpedo-capable DDs in the game, but currently, we consider both USN and KM DDs to be quite torpedo-capable, too. The most powerful torpedoes are likely to stay for IJN.

Q: Overall, are you guys happy with the current meta at all tiers, or would you like to push it in a specific direction or another?

A: We would like to limit or reduce the population of BBs on some regions/tiers. We also would like to fix CVs overall (sealclubbing on low tiers, very hard and challenging on high tiers). These are global challenges. Other than that, it is the matter of fine-tuning specific ships.

Q: Question regarding the state of stealth torpedo boats.

A: As for torpedo boats, we don’t consider them to be in a very weak state, as you said. The problem is that their state changed. Over months, stealth torpedo gameplay was transformed. Some players used to launch powerful and fast torpedoes over large ranges, easily, being undetected. With several balance changes we motivated them to be in closer contact and to endanger themselves, especially with radars and HAS around (or remain torp spammers, but with inefficient long torpedoes). IJN DD line split also brought more gun gameplay, so these ships are not 100% pure stealthy torpedoboats they used to be. Thus, such playstyle became more challenging. This is harsh for players, as they have to adapt and play differently. But now, we feel stealth torpedo gameplay is more balanced.

Q: What was the rationale behind giving (effectively all T5+ fighters) +50% ammo with AGM2? Poor performance of AS players? I am very concerned as this encourages clicking.

Also, this will make strike Ranger and Lex extremely hard to play (judging from ASIA server’s fighter control preference).

A: Buffing USN CVs, mostly. Especially the less skillful part of player base.

I am fully aware of general attitude of many skilled CV players towards AS gameplay, though. I hope the situation will get better for everyone after general CV improvements.

Advertisements

14 thoughts on “WoWS Q&A – 28th January 2017

  1. Q: Question regarding Radar mechanics.

    A: With the exception of Missouri, Radar is purely cruiser option. We don’t want to add cruiser – DD counter. That would be cruiser nerf, which is currently not desirable.

    Battleships get to counter DD, why the fuck can’t cruisers and DD counter their weaknesses? Oh right. Money.

    _______________________________________________________________________________

    Q 1: The destroyer damage build is somewhat weaker than pre-patch (e.g. DE power level reduction) and survivability has been indirectly nerfed through the implementation of new tools (e.g. RPF) to hunt DDs. Is there a plan to offset this power level reduction elsewhere?

    A 1: The choice is here not only for DD captains. We wanted to make BB builds more specific with Aux guns, AA and Survival as main directions. General purpose builds are still viable, but we expect them to be less efficient. We would like to see more diversity in BB gameplay with these changes.

    Q 2: On a related note, as someone who enjoys DDs, CL/CAs, and BBs, I’m a little nervous about the direction of BBs right now. Is there any thought about the power level of BBs and what might be necessary to bring CL/CAs back to the fore a bit?

    A 2: We’re nervous about BB population growth, too. I have to say, I reviewed this last week. The growth is slowing down (which is good), but not that fast, so It is hard to tell right now whether we will see some healthy (for the meta) decline a bit later. Actually, we hope 0.6.0 will contribute here in a positive way. We also have some options in testing, if this tendency does not change.

    So you’re worried about BB population yet you release a skill set that is pretty much made for them? GTFO.

    _______________________________________________________________________________

    Q 2: Are you planning to bring an alternative line to IJN Torpedo boats? There are plenty ships with gunpower at DD class atm, i think what makes DDs interesting is torpeedos.

    A 2: There will be other torpedo-capable DDs in the game, but currently, we consider both USN and KM DDs to be quite torpedo-capable, too. The most powerful torpedoes are likely to stay for IJN.

    Yeah right. You’ve already removed some decent torps from the IJN and the Shimakaze’s long lance aren’t that great. There’s a SN DD split coming soon. I imagine they will get the best torpedoes then with that rework.

    Like

  2. “We would like to limit or reduce the population of BBs on some regions/tiers.”

    Well… i dont know about the Meta that much.. but i feel like BBs are the backbone of this game.
    The perfect matches, in my opinion, feature around 6-7 BBs 4-5 Cruisers, 2 DDs and a Carrier per side. And i have a feel those games are the most fun for all classes to play (as being a player who plays all classes actively).

    If you reduce the number of BBs now, you would indirectly reduce the amount of damage in the game aswell, indirectly limiting the XP and alot of other factors for gamers.

    I think, wargaming is not able to think in long term.
    They just plan for the next patch and the immediate future with all “might-be” advantages, disregarding or just plain ignoring the disadvantages of certain changes.

    Like

    1. How long do we have to keep repeating that xp and credits are based on the % of damage done to a ship,not directly hp?

      6-7 BBs per match is insanity, it grinds every single game to a halt, and makes every single game as a cruiser and a gunboat DD an idotic long range pew pew match where you pray for the enemy to be dumb and have poor fire management.

      Every single radical change in the game, from torpedo nerfs, fire nerfs, CV nerfs, etc…has been made to accomodate an every increasing amount of BBs in the game.
      Hell, you JUST read that BB growth is still increasing. Not as fast, but it’s still increasing.

      it is absolutely unbelievable for an online game to have over 40% of all matches be played by one single class of ship. By my estimation and date collecting, we’re currently at around 42-43% of all matches played being BBs, out of 4 classes of ships.
      I have literally never seen something so poorly balanced in my decades of online gaming.

      Like

      1. And who would be “we”?

        Ever played Navyfield before? The game you play, is a relative to the good old navyfield, where you had JUST BBs and CVs being important in lategame, out of 6 classes.

        To throw in some more thoughts. What in your opinion would the gameplay be like, if you would have lets say 4 DDs 4 CL and 4 BBs per side, in comparisation to my abovementioned composition?

        I will be alot worse in terms of “long range pew-pew” because the bbs will actually not move into close combat at all, because there are so few of themand they will be even harder focused down. Think about it.

        Like

        1. Are you denying that xp and credits are % based, rather than hp based?

          The ideal game isn’t a perfect mix of everything, the ideal match has more cruisers than both DDs and BBs.
          Both of the latter should be tactical assets, rather than the backbone of a team.

          And we should completely gimp other classes because the common BB player isn’t able to play as a team?
          We should all bend over and take it up the ass people some people are cowards?

          No.
          If there were 2-3 BBs per team max, those ships would be assets, and the team that used them correctly would win.
          It would be something called….teamwork.
          The TEAM that WORKS as a TEAM gets the upper hand.

          If you start balancing the game to better fit the lowest common denominator, you might as well just stop developing the game altogether, it’s not worth ut.

          Like

            1. Hehe… true true…
              Love those games where I see all DDs going to one Cap, and BBs and CA going to others not supporting each other.
              There are so many basic problems about the *what is my task in the team* that most games are just some ego players driving arround with ships, arguing that NO ONE helpes HIM 🙂

              Like

  3. Man no RPF is op on here……shit just jinxed it.

    KM DDs in the higher tiers are mostly Torp botes too because their guns are less then ideal…..and their smokes are terrible….and their torps are good.

    WG just needs to find the fine line of making Torp botes balanced, not underpowered and not spamming out Great Walls of torps to pop up 1km away every minute. I think they found it, the Yugumo has great torps, but only 8, and decent guns. The Shima should problably get a slight gun buff or lower the torp detection range by 100-300 meters

    Like

  4. Haha!!! Failseb again copypasting someone elses summary, even keeping the format.

    TAPsaster as always. Delicious.

    Like

    1. Thats why ppl keep coming here – they don’t need to look through reddits, forums, other sites&blogs. All important stuff is here – like google news taking all news from other sources.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. can someone who speaks russian (maybe the person who translates Q&As) ask the devs about the South Carolina, Wyoming, Colorado, New York and New Mexico submerged 21inch (533mm) torpedo tubes? only the New York has 4 and the rest only 2 but if they are in the front they can be useful sometimes, like when going head-on with a enemy BB, and wouldn’t be OP since the US BBs are the most “crippled” in the game and on the other hand there are already BBs in the game that have it all:
    guns
    range
    armor
    speed
    and
    torpedos

    I would like for them to answer why we don’t have this option in the game when the ships had them irl

    Like

    1. I think Montana needs the help more than any of these USN BBs. I mean a lot more. I seen enough games in T10 where poor Montana is treated like a T9 BB when it faces Yamato or GK.

      Like

    2. WG does not model submerged torpedo tubes. The Japanese had them too. And both USN and IJN BBs had these tubes removed during the course of modernisation, so your argument is invalid.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s