T-54 first prototype
| Was | became | |
|---|---|---|
| Reloading time of the 100 mm D-10T-K gun for the T-54 turret, first sample | 8 sec | 7.5 sec |
| Armor penetration of the UBR-412 projectile for the 100 mm D-10T-K gun | 190 mm | 210 mm |
| Armor penetration of the UBR-412P projectile for the 100 mm D-10T-K gun | 247 mm | 260 mm |
The T-54, the first model, was considered insufficiently effective in combat: low armor penetration, an insufficiently comfortable weapon, and low damage per minute. The following changes have been made: the characteristics of armor penetration, stabilization and reload speed have been increased.
| Was | became | |
|---|---|---|
| Aiming time for the 107 mm M-75K gun for the KV-4 KTTS turret | 2.5 sec | 2.2 sec |
| View range of the KV-4 KTTS turret | 350 m | 370 m |
| The dispersion of the gun due to the movement of the KV-4 KTTS chassis has been reduced by 23%. |
| The dispersion of the gun from the KV-4 KTTS chassis traverse has been reduced by 23%. |
| The dispersion of the 107 mm M-75K gun when rotating the barrel has been reduced by 17%. |
M46 Patton KR
| Was | became | |
|---|---|---|
| Reload time of the 90 mm Gun M3A1 for the M46 Patton KR turret | 7.4 sec | 6.4 sec |
| Aiming time of the 90 mm Gun M3A1 for the M46 Patton KR turret | 2.2 sec | 1.9 sec |
| M46 Patton KR Turret View Range | 390 m | 400 m |
| Armor penetration of the basic T33 projectile of the 90 mm Gun M3A1 gun | 192 mm | 216 mm |
| Armor penetration of the special projectile M304 of the 90 mm Gun M3A1 | 243 mm | 260 mm |
| The dispersion of the gun due to movement of the M46 Patton KR chassis has been reduced by 17%. |
| Gun dispersion due to rotation of the M46 Patton KR chassis has been reduced by 17%. |
The M46 Patton KR is not effective enough in combat compared to other medium tanks. Increasing the firepower of vehicles by increasing armor penetration, rate of fire, visibility and stabilization will make playing on a tank more comfortable.
M-V-Y
| Was | became | |
|---|---|---|
| Reload time of 105 mm Gun T141 for MVY JJ turret | 7.3 sec | 7.95 sec |
| Armor penetration of the HEAT-T T298E2 projectile of the 105 mm Gun T141 | 330 mm | 320 mm |
| Armor penetration of the HVAPDS-T T279E2 projectile for the 105 mm Gun T141 gun | 274 mm | 268 mm |
| Maximum forward speed | 50 km/h | 45 km/h |
M-V-Y stands out among vehicles of its class and level both in Random Battles and in competitive game modes. The following changes have been made: reduced speed, armor penetration and rate of fire.
FSV Scheme A
| Was | became | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy at 100 m of the 75 mm M6 gun in the FSV Scheme A turret | 0.33 | 0.37 |
| Aiming time of the 75 mm M6 gun for the FSV Scheme A turret | 1.8 sec | 2.3 sec. |
Concept No. 5
| Was | became | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy at 100 m of the 110 mm Medium Velocity Gun in the Concept No. 5 turret | 0.31 | 0.32 |
| Reload time for the 110 mm Medium Velocity Gun for the Concept No. turret. 5 | 9.6 sec | 10.1 sec |
| Aiming time for the 110 mm Medium Velocity Gun for the Concept No. turret. 5 | 1.8 sec | 1.9 sec |
| Dispersion of the gun due to the movement of the chassis Concept No. 5 increased by 10%. |
| The dispersion of the Concept No. 5 gun when turning the chassis has been increased by 10%. |
After the changes made in update 1.24, Concept No. 5 and FSV Scheme A began to stand out compared to other medium tanks of their level. In the current iteration, changes have been made to the firing characteristics of both tanks.
Super Conqueror
| Was | became | |
|---|---|---|
| Reload time of the 120 mm Gun L1A1 for the Conqueror “Unorthodox” ABP turret | 8.7 sec | 9.5 sec |
Based on the test results, it was decided to make changes to the characteristics and armor scheme of the Super Conqueror tank (compared to the previous iteration of changes ): the armor of the rangefinder zone was changed from 230 mm to 250 mm, and the rate of fire of the gun was also reduced.
| Was | became | |
|---|---|---|
| Strength with CS-53M1 turret | 1,300 HP | 1,450 HP |
| Accuracy at 100 m of the Armata wz. 58 gun in the CS-53M1 turret | 0.38 | 0.36 |
| Reload time of the 100 mm armata wz. 58 gun for the CS-53M1 turret | 8.6 sec | 8.2 sec |
| Aiming time for the 100 mm armata wz gun. 58 for CS-53M1 turret | 2.5 sec | 2.1 sec |
| Speed when changing engine operating mode | 50/17 km/h | 70/25 km/h |
| GTD-M1 engine power when changing operating modes | 710 hp | 1,150 hp |
| The dispersion of the gun due to movement of the CS-53 II chassis has been reduced by 11%. |
| Gun dispersion due to rotation of the CS-53 II chassis has been reduced by 11%. |
| Added gas turbine engine mechanics. |
CS-59
| Was | became | |
|---|---|---|
| Speed when changing engine operating mode | 50/17 km/h | 70/25 km/h |
| GTD-M1 engine power when changing operating modes | 710 hp | 1,150 hp |
| The dispersion of the 105 mm armata wz. 59 gun when turning the turret has been reduced by 20%. |
| The dispersion of the gun due to the movement of the CS-59 II chassis has been reduced by 13%. |
| Gun dispersion due to rotation of the CS-59 II chassis has been reduced by 13%. |
| Added gas turbine engine mechanics. |
| The mechanism for turning the CS-59 II chassis has been changed (the rotation is carried out around its axis). |
Carro d’assalto P.88
| Was | became | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy at 100 m of the Cannone da 90/62 gun in the P.88 seconda variant turret | 0.42 | 0.38 |
| Cannon da 90/62 aiming time for P.88 turret seconda variante | 2.5 sec | 2.3 sec |
| Turret viewing range P.88 seconda variante | 350 m | 360 m |
| Was | became | |
|---|---|---|
| Aiming time for the Cannone da 105/71 gun for the Progetto CC55 mod turret. 54 B | 2.5 sec | 2.3 sec |
| Reload time for the Cannone da 105/71 gun for the Progetto CC55 mod turret. 54 B | 13/14/16 sec | 11/13/14 sec |
| Was | became | |
|---|---|---|
| Dispersion of the Cannone da 120/62 gun in the Progetto C50 tipo 3 turret | 0.36 m | 0.34 m |
| Cannon da 120/62 aiming time for Progetto C50 type 3 turret | 2.7 sec | 2.3 sec |
| Engine power MB 838 | 690 hp | 760 hp |
| Was | became | |
|---|---|---|
| Strength with Rinoceronte tower | 2,000 HP | 2,300 HP |
| Reload time of the 127 mm OTO Melara gun | 15.7/17/20 sec | 14/15.7/17 sec |
Got Rinoceronte 2x instead of the T9 heavy
WG dosent give a shit mate
Meanwhile wot EU just sells you more fans premiums 🤦🏼♂️💩
Do you even realise how many premiums (such as the chieftain and arty and a Gold WTE100) lesta/wot ru sold since their breakup.
Armored patrol frames their shit. They stopped posting about the weird sales of their premiums and pro arty changes and p2w changes. Why? I dont know. Maybe they hate wg that much (well this is obvious) so that they try to present lesta as the good guys.
Lesta never sold any tier 10 Chieftains, WT E 100 was in the loot boxes which you barely see in battles, there is 1 tier 8 flamethrower which was obtainable once so its very rare in battles, artys are the same as on WG servers. Stop spreading bs when you dont play both servers and you have absolutely no idea what are you talking about.
its ukrainian or nafofag bot, dont bother
“donchu know russian server is doing bad mate “
tf is bro yapping about
Putting aside non sense toxic comments specifically from some Russian players. I mean its pretty clear once Lesta is struggling when large amount of RU players opt against supporting Lesta World of Tanks (this includes playing to improve their “stats” and improve their Sales tax which is going to war as a bad clause ) …then most RU players went to EU World of Tanks
I mean look at their recent tanks like Poland Tech Tree…they keep using same poland turbo feature over and over again
Lesta World of Tanks (RU) obviously trying hilariously 1 UP the NA/EU/ASIA World of Tanks…and RU WOT failing
Russian World of Tanks remains sub par
Why not use your brain before thinking. You might not then write such wankstain comments.
You clearly don’t know anything about either game
nafofag spotted. You are making up bullshit about Lesta just because its RU server. They obviously struggle more, but are also more dedicated to their game than WG. And thats good for WG players too, because WG know they see what is happening on RU server.
WoT RU has been doing some nice balancing lately… but why on gods green earth did they nerf the British wheeled MT XD
Because they overbuffed those cars.
The RU version of the Concept No.5 is simply a better Leo1, way faster with pretty much the same gun.
The more positive changes Lesta makes, the sadder it becomes for our version of WoT.
WG is just a bunch of lazy & greedy mfs.
Only by stop buying anything from them, we might have a chance of making our game better.
Look at how many Mezfi s self-commenting praising Russia again
Because obviously they are doing a good job with the game.. fk off with your politics when it comes to entering a game and wanting to enjoy it and clearly WG just after couple months proved they are lazy and incapable.. buffed and nerfed in total of 4 tanks and on top of their stupidity added ammo for BT-5 or some sht… meanwhile Lesta are finishing with tank rebalancing leaving everyone satisfied enough with fair and needed changes.. truth hurts or what? 30+ tanks needs rebalancing for level play field.. Lesta did that..
I don’t see any pro russian comments you fucking twat. Fuck off.
You’re the fucking idiot if you keep playing EU.
I play EU but RU are shitting on EU wot in terms of changes, maps, balancing etc.
What’s EU wot excuse?
lmao i really do have a fucking fan on this cesspit site
The EU server is a Joke, it’s not even funny anymore. Genuinely asking myself if they doing it on purpose or if they’re just dumb af.
I’ve not paid any money to WG in years and only play frontlines now
Pro Putin eu commenters are upset that EU new content are destroying Lesta flamethrower clowns. Yea lesta released flamethrowers tanks ignoring community opposition now ru can’t keep their large player base.
Sounds like a you problem….
Spreading nonsense without any background knowledge, there was 1 tier 8 flamethrower tank on Lesta servers and it isnt used at all because its rare and useless. Normal tanks are used which got rebalanced and fun to play again.
This has nothing to do with IRL things, clearly Lesta makes a lot better job developing their version of WoT. While WG is afraid to change 2 digit stats on anything, Lesta makes long forgotten tanks fun to play.
Buffs to Polish mediums are long overdue, guess WG doesn’t care because CS-63 is the only one that matters in their eyes.
Everyone used to blame the Russians of wot for lack of game improvements. Since ru split off they’ve made lots of improvements for players.
Now eu has no excuse and still do nothing except test more and more fake premium tanks for their 8 and 9.
No new modes, no meaningful rebalancing or new maps 🤷🏼♂️
Seems good news 👍🏼
Polish buffs are good news.
I totally agree that articles about WOT RU should be moved low importance/Other category
While main news should be focus on WOT NA/EU/ASIA only.
So that would just be news about more premium tank super tests 🥱
I reality World of Tanks EU/NA is doing better on improving and adding features aside of claims of massive premium tank release while WOT RU (facts) putting turbo on new tech tree tanks, unnecessary tier system for sales events, trying to get ahead in numbers (company or employee quotas), and gets upset a Ukraine Bundle is being released for WOT NA/E.
Fuck off back to America you bot.
You dont even know what you’re talking about.
Nobody even mentioned “bonds” lol
EU “still release more features” lol you are joker.
Comparing WOT Russia with WOT NA/EU is out of bonds. They dont have same laws or restrictions.. Even if NA/EU was under little more restrictions or less freedom…they still releasing new features and does not go overboard like RU did. RU trying put tier system on popular sales events…