WoT CT 1.20: MBT-B Characteristics Nerfed Back


MBT-B returned in terms of performance characteristics to about the 3rd iteration of the Supertested one.

Firepower:
• Dispersion from movement (max.): 0.13 (5.20) to 0.14 (5.60)
• Dispersion from tank traverse (max.): c 0.13 (6.10) to 0.14 (5.55)
• Aiming time: from 1.92 to 2.21 sec
• Armor penetration of 3 (HE) shells: from 125 to 90 mm
• Shell velocity of 3 (HE) shells: from 1,000 to 900 m/s
• Gun Loading: 8.63 to 10.07 sec
• Gun fire rate: from 6.95 to 5.96 
• Average damage per minute of 1 (AP) projectile: from 2920 to 2503
• Average damage per minute of 2 (HEAT) projectile: 2920 to 2503
• Average damage per minute of 3 (HE) projectile: 3581 to 3069

Mobility:
• Chassis turning speed: from 46.93 to 39.63°
• Engine power: 1100 to 1000 h.p.
• Specific power: from 18.33 to 16.67 h.p./t
• Max. forward speed: from 45 to 40 km/h

11 thoughts on “WoT CT 1.20: MBT-B Characteristics Nerfed Back

  1. No, the tank was ALREADY nerfed to this state in the supertest. Its stats in the game files and on tanks.gg haven’t been updated until recently. It was never “re-buffed” or “re-nerfed” at all.

    1. With 1.20 CT1 stats then maybe, or CW reward, because it’s OP as fck.
      But with 1.20 CT2 stats, I can assure you they will not introduce a reward tank that is weaker than the techtree E5.
      The MBT-B in 1.20 CT2 does not only get its stats nerfed a lot, it also gets a massive 240mm flat plate on the turret.
      While its hull is not even comparable to the E5’s hull, its turret is basically the same as E5’s turret, plus a worse gun than E5’s gun. A bit more dynamics won’t make any difference.
      So yeah, they’re just testing the tank.

  2. Won’t change this thing’s OPness (bond equipment and food exist), but thankfully they reverted what were completely unnecessary buffs.

    We are in 2023 and the purple kids should learn that what they get as prizes should be unique, not overpowered.

    1. Hi there, a 29 y/o purple kid here asking if you’re a 70+ super old grandpa who doesn’t even care about what he’s gonna say is true or not? =))))

        1. There are 2 reasons you’re still clueless by now.
          Either you don’t have full info of the tank or you’re just bad at the game.

          1. I’m not sure what are you on about.

            Anyone can access tanks.gg and check the latest iteration of the test server which includes this tank. Anyone with a bit of common sense (that’s the tricky part) will see that it is far too good and yet another proof WG has to bribe unicums to make them play clanwar, ranks, and so on – the players themselves prove this is the case with their “pay us or we won’t play” demands.

            If you still think that, as of the latest round of changes, MBT-B is underpowered or even weak, you’re trying too hard and I’m not sure which tank would qualify as “strong” for you. Maybe stuff like XM1A3 or K2 Black Panther from AW? Which would be Tier 20 if they were in WoT.

          2. Anyone can access “full info” on MBT-B by going to tanks.gg and checking the latest test server iteration, I’m not sure what’s hard about that.

            A look at said stats will confirm that this tank is far too good and yet another payment from WG to the unicums who cannot play clanwar and Ranked without getting bribed with OP stuff.

            If you believe the tank is bad, you’re hopeless. Perhaps you’d be happy if they added things like XM1A3 or K2 Black Panther? They would be Tier 20 power-wise.

          3. Anyone can access “full info” on MBT-B by going to tanks.gg and checking the latest test server iteration, I’m not sure what’s hard about that.

            A look at said stats will confirm that this tank is far too good and yet another payment from WG to the unicums who cannot play clanwar and Ranked without getting bribed with OP stuff.

            If you believe the tank is bad, you’re hopeless. Perhaps you’d be happy if they added things like CATTB or K2 Black Panther? They would be Tier 20 power-wise.

Leave a Reply to purple kidCancel reply