World of Tanks Supertest – M48A2 Räumpanzer and TL-1 (T95E2) LPC detailed stats

These 2 vehicles, according to russian sources, are premium tanks and unlikely to go public, E-75 TS could be a part of an E-100 line rework.

Tier VIII German medium tank M48A2 Räumpanzer Full stats


Main armament: 90cm kanone M41;

Shells  –M77 AP/ M304 APCR / M71 HE;

Alpha damage  240/240/320;

Penetration values – 205/255/45;

Damage per minute – 1726;

Rate of fire –  7,2 (8,342 s. reload);

Shell velocity – 972 m/s (AP);

Gun accuracy – 0.42;

Aim time – 1.92 s.

Aim circle spread –

  • after shot – 3,356;
  • on turret traverse – 0,096;
  • on tank movement – 0,134;
  • on tank traverse – 0,134;

Gun depression – 9 degrees;


View range – 380;

Camouflage values –

  • Stationary 13,9 %;
  • On movement 10,5 %;
  • During shooting while stationary 3,31 %;
  • On movement while shooting – 2,5 %;


Engine power – 650;

Vehicle traverse speed – 35;

Specific power ratio – 13 hp/t;

Maximum speed –

  1. forwards 40 km/h;
  2. backwards 18 km/h;

Terrain resistances –

  • on hard terrain – 0,767;
  • on medium Terrain –0,863;
  • on soft terrain – 1,726;


Hull front / side – 152,4 mm / 76,2 mm; (The bulldozer shovel adds to the effective armor at the front, not included here)

Turret front / side – 254 mm / 76,2 mm;

Tier VIII American medium tank T95E2 LPC Full stats


Main armament: 90mm gun M41E1L;

Shells  –M318 AP/ M348 HEAT / T91E3 HE;

Alpha damage  280/280/370;

Penetration values – 205/280/45;

Damage per minute – 2085;

Rate of fire –  7,45 (8,1 s. reload);

Shell velocity – 914 m/s (AP);

Gun accuracy – 0.336;

Aim time – 2,01 s.

Aim circle spread –

  • after shot – 3,356;
  • on turret traverse – 0,096;
  • on tank movement – 0,134;
  • on tank traverse – 0,134;

Gun depression – 9 degrees;


View range – 400;

Camouflage values –

  • Stationary 16,7 %;
  • On movement 12,5 %;
  • During shooting while stationary 3,97 %;
  • On movement while shooting – 2,98 %;


Engine power – 666;

Vehicle traverse speed – 46;

Specific power ratio – 18 hp/t;

Maximum speed –

  1. forwards 50 km/h;
  2. backwards 20 km/h;

Terrain resistances –

  • on hard terrain – 0,863;
  • on medium Terrain –1,055;
  • on soft terrain – 1,822;


Hull front / side – 88.9 mm / 50.8 mm;

Turret front / side – 177.8 mm / 76.2 mm;

0 thoughts on “World of Tanks Supertest – M48A2 Räumpanzer and TL-1 (T95E2) LPC detailed stats

  1. I like the sound of E-100 line rework.

    Finally downtier the Tiger and TigerII like every one of their premium variant. And add the E-75TS as the new tier 8.

  2. > unlikely to go public

    I don\’t get the meaning of this. Are they supposed to be reward only or something like that?

      1. I prey they do tanks for bonds and these are some of them . I heard a stupid tanks for bonds event where there are limits on them and it only runs for like a week. They said early spring then 1.5 well its July and still no tanks for bonds dam liars.

  3. I don\’t like the E75 TS at all, nothing makes sence to me. it\’s supposed to have \”enhanced armor\” but has worse raw thickness than Tiger 2.

    This is roughly what I would like an E75 TS to be:
    A (historical) Tiger II with E75 hull.
    Really good armor, but slower and a bad, but usable cannon at tier 8.
    Essentially a Tier 8 KV-220.

    1. Yes it has less raw thickness on the upper front plate but it has 10 degrees more angling on both the upper and lower front plate which leads to a massive difference in protection against all ammunition. The Tiger 2\’s front and lower plate are both angled at 50 degrees which leads to these values vs AP rounds in game UPF=212.13, FLP=141.42 where as the E75 TS would have these values vs AP UPF=244.08, FLP=174.35 and thats assuming lower plate is the same thickness as the Tiger 2 but it\’s likely to be thicker and I haven\’t even mentioned the turret armour which seems to just be better than the Tiger 2\’s in every way and may even be better than the E75 due to the mantlet which covers the almost the entire turret front. With all this said thou I would rather them add the Tiger 2 105 as the new tier 8 as that thing actually has blueprints made for it, would fit the feel of the line and they could just as easily make up values for the armour to make it better fit than the current Tiger like they have done for other tanks before.

      1. Okay, lets add the Tiger 2 10,5 cm but it still has the same shitty armour since it is the same tank with an upgraded gun… they still have to make changes to the tank to improve it for tier 8 and unfortunately those changes are not historical accurate… maybe add a lot of tracklinks on the side that improves armour thickness. Don\’t get me wrong, but a lot of people that play WoT don\’t really care about historical accuracy.. the people that care play War Thunder. I want to see what their source is for creating the E75 TS, it looks cool and don\’t mind it as new tier 8, but I want to see where they got the building blocks from.

        1. I honestly just think they took the E75s hull armour with historical values (if you measure the armour thickness on the E75s blue print it comes to about what this tanks armour is going to be) and made a turret from combing the Löwe turret and Tiger 2s top turret and added side skirts just to give it a more unique feel I don\’t believe that besides the Hull any other part of this tank was even planned. As for the Tiger 2 105 I said I would rather see that because it at least had a finished sketch made for it that didn\’t detail anything about the tank besides that it would feature the 105mm kwk 68 cannon meaning that Wargaming could literally just make up values for the armour like they have with so many other blueprint tanks and it\’s not like it\’s the first time they\’ve changed the historical armour values of other vehicles to fit their tire anyway eg caernarvon(hell they even remove this ones historical gun for some reason). All Wargaming have to do to make a Tiger 2 105 competetive at tier 8 is give it more or less the same stats with the Tiger 2 H turret as stock, remove the 88mm and buff the 10,5 kwk L52, give it 20mm more armour on the hull and give it the new turret (which would look like the E75s) with the same thickness thats been proposed for the E75TS and bame suddenly a tier 8 Tiger 2 would be relevant again.
          PS my proposal doesn\’t take into account people spamming premium rounds at it.

  4. I have noticed a trend with almost all new tanks and that is bad dispersion Gun accuracy – 0.42; . we keep asking for less rng and wargaming keeps making more by giving tanks bad dispersion. its a 90 mm gun with durp gun dispersion . Really tired of how badly wargaming does anything .

  5. the E75 TS should get that 105mm gun, the gun damage growth looks more natural… 360>490>750 VS 390>490>750

Leave a Reply