Excalibur Pre-Alpha Footage (TAP Exclusive)

UPDATE: Videos got taken down by Wargaming. Linked reuploads instead.

You might remember Excalibur, we had a post with its logo 2 years ago. WG Seattle was making this until it was shut down and the project was transferred to Minsk for finishing. Looks like AW with Heliborne to me. However, it might kill Armored Warfare.

Unfortunately, the original videos were removed from YouTube by WG.

Advertisements

43 thoughts on “Excalibur Pre-Alpha Footage (TAP Exclusive)

  1. It is looking good being early development.

    Though, in my opinion on the why did AW not become a success, besides the internal decisions debacles, was because it focused on modern tank warfare.
    I do not know a lot of my former clan mates in WoT who are interested in the modern combat era and it’s vehicles.
    Most of them, and other I know who have played/play WoT, do so because of the setting in history spanning from early WW2 to early/mid Cold-war machines.

    This I do think Excalibur is threading on thin ice, whereby focusing on developing a modern tank could result in less appeal to potential new customers.

    Personally taste, I would be far more interested if it was’n’t focused on modern tank warfare.

    I wish the development team all the best and may they learn from the pitfall their former competition fell into.

    Liked by 5 people

    1. armored warfare died because they added pve and because they fired obsidian and now russians are making the game. And if there is one thing russians cant do its making games.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. lol no PvE was the greatest thing AW could add cause not everyone enjoys PVP, AW allowed thos like me that love tanks to actually play without the mess of insults i got on WoT for being a 1100 WN8 average player

        Liked by 2 people

      2. Yeah that’s part of the “internal decisions debacles” I mentioned. My.com f-ed up, if they let the Obsidian do ther thing: developing games, things could have turned out better IMO.

        Still think a modern tank game won’t attract as much potential customers.

        Saw WG having taken over development…which made me shrug a little tbh.

        Like

    2. it shows that it is made by an american company, there’s just too many things flashing on the screen, otherwise it seems to share one failure with AW, eveything seems too “arcady”, like in AW the models do not seem made of metal and there’s obviously a need to improve textures, for both vehicles and map objects, and while those special habilities may seem a bit too much for PvP, they surely would work wonderfully in a PvE mode

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I’m very sorry but the last thing we want is Wargaming in charge of another game. Their recent (last 2 years) of balancing in World of Tanks is making clear they are caring less and less about enjoyable gameplay and more and more about milking the game for what it’s worth before the majority of players give up on it.

    Ironically speeding up said process by terrible balancing.

    Liked by 2 people

      1. Doesn’t matter if the top brass insists on forcing out the milk at every possible turn. Just because a different team develops a game doesn’t mean the end goal of the publisher is not the same.

        Liked by 1 person

  3. It looks pretty fun all considering. The same base WoT gameplay with a ton of new additions to make it different. I hope we can play it soon.

    Like

  4. That actually looks great.
    Looking intrigued.

    Not a big fan of adding helos, but their movement looks very interesting, dare I say from the trailer, well implemented.

    Like

    1. And because the devs were constantly revising core gameplay mechanics.

      Spamming the shop with premiums with reskins pretty much told everyone :” we’re fucked, let us milk you for a year or two before you realize it”

      Funny thing is that the fanboys on the AW forums will blame everything but the fact that the game was just poorly thought out shit.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Its not that any of AW’s modes were actually bad, it just never got off the ground because the population was small to begin with and split between the PVE and PVP queues. If they had only ran one mode, even if it was just the PVE, they would have been much more successful.

    As of Excalibur, the one and only question worth asking is whether or not its dev team learned anything from all the bad decisions made during the development of games like WoT (especially WoT), WT, AW, et cetera. If it looks like they’re even considering repeating any of the same mistakes, then I’m out.

    Like

      1. As I commented below, WG Seattle studio was in charge of development but they were closed. 99% chance that Excalibur won’t be in development anymore.

        Liked by 1 person

  6. I don’t want to be a sourpuss or anything, but don’t think I will ever play a game made by Wargaming again. From what I hear EA is even worse, but still, WG has managed to thoroughly put me off over the last two years or so.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Well, the videos got taken down. Seattle studio is closed so the fate of the project is pretty much sealed. It’s probably the last thing we’ll ever see about Excalibur.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.