WoWS: Full Stats, Armor and Models of French Cruisers (Tiers 6 to 10) + Duca D’Aosta Stats

PS: The TAP insider tells that Prinz Eugen’s draft was increased from 7.19 meters to 7.7 meters in the Supertest. Also, seems invisifiring removal is not certain yet – ST client seems to not have it anymore (my bet is that it’s just WG’s usual reaction to leaks that may generate general player riots like the Alabama ST one some time ago). More info soon, and sorry for any inconvenience we may have caused.

Video with all the French cruiser models:

Credit: gamemodels3d

Tier 9: Saint Louis

Tier 8: Charles Martel

Commentary: The 3D model is very similar to the Saint Louis, and the armor is nearly identical. This includes its very standard 25mm bow armor and 25mm deck armor.

Tier 10: Henri IV

Armor cross-section (multi-layered armor):

Consumables loadout for tiers 8-10:

Tier 7: Algerie

Tier 6: La Galissonnière

Everything else at tier 1-6 has RN CL or worse than RN CL armor with citadels above the waterline. So they are not really worth leaking.

Bonus –  Duca D’Aosta stats:

 

Advertisements

12 thoughts on “WoWS: Full Stats, Armor and Models of French Cruisers (Tiers 6 to 10) + Duca D’Aosta Stats

  1. Friant has a Catapult gear equipped
    O_O
    didn’t know Frenchies start equipping catapult fighters at that tier other than Katori

    Like

  2. Tier 9 has much better AA than tier 10, wut. Also is it just me or does the tier 9 have some weird gun/torp angles, looks unsymmetrical. Overall, looks pretty standard, seems to be on the lower end of the health pool and mediocre AA.

    Like

    1. Tier 9 has more aa guns, true, but I don´t think the will be better. After all those 57mm are probably “high-tech” aa systems, radar guided etc … The dps will most likely be higher. I also wouldn´t agree with “pretty standard”. From tier 8 up decent armor (likely) punchy guns, torps and high turning circles. Sounds like awesome heavy cruisers.

      Liked by 1 person

    2. I just think that they balanced from the bottom up, so lower tiers are done being balanced, but higher tiers are in process of.

      It would explain why the tier9 has worse guns all around then the Baltimore for similar armor, maneuverability and worse AA, and no radar. Just for two torpedo launchers.
      And why the tier10 is just a garbage version of the Moskva.

      Like

    3. tier 9 have:
      100mm x 10 with AAA (anti air aura): 0.34, 5s reload time and 5km range
      37mm bofors x16 with AAA: 0.64, 0.5s reload and 3.5km range
      37mm ACAD x8 with AAA: 0.48, 0.5s reload and 3.5km range
      20mm M4 with AAA: 0.58, 0.1s reload and 2.0km range

      tier 10 have:
      127mm x 12 with AAA: 0.94, 5s reload time and 5.2km range
      57mm x16 ACAD with AAA: 0.97, 0.5s reload and 3.5km range.

      so tier 10 have fair superior long range AA (11.28 vs 3.4), superior mid range AA (15.52 vs 14.08), but don’t have any short range AA, but effectivity of short range AA is questionable at high tiers.

      about armor i compared colors on pictures and it seems that both tier 8 and tier 9 have 120mm belt armor with is pretty ok’sh but still not on high end (and can cause citadels instead of overpens like on Russian cruisers) and its above waterline.

      shell krupp values also seem pretty midcore, but at last not very low when considering their big bursting charges with generally lower krupp value:

      French:
      8inch (7-9 tier): 2434
      240mm (10 tier): 2282

      Jap 8inch: 2468

      US:
      normal 8inch: 2846
      super heavy 8inch 2919

      Russian Moskwa: 2590

      German 8inch: 2409

      Like

    4. Tier X has much worse AA than Tier IX because the 57mm ACAD twin for no apparent reason has almost the same DPS as the 40mm Bofors twin.

      Like

      1. read again weapons params 57mm give more mid range AA (15.52 vs 14.08):
        tier 9 have:
        100mm x 10 with AAA (anti air aura): 0.34, 5s reload time and 5km range
        37mm bofors x16 with AAA: 0.64, 0.5s reload and 3.5km range
        37mm ACAD x8 with AAA: 0.48, 0.5s reload and 3.5km range
        20mm M4 with AAA: 0.58, 0.1s reload and 2.0km range

        tier 10 have:
        127mm x 12 with AAA: 0.94, 5s reload time and 5.2km range
        57mm x16 ACAD with AAA: 0.97, 0.5s reload and 3.5km range.

        so tier 10 have fair superior long range AA (11.28 vs 3.4), superior mid range AA (15.52 vs 14.08), but don’t have any short range AA, but effectivity of short range AA is questionable at high tiers.

        Like

      1. Tier 5 and below are just HE-citadel magnet due to their non-existent armor. If you think Caleadon or Emerald are bad, you’re wrong. Their armors are worse than a Destroyer.

        Like

    1. Tier6 and 7 look like the absolute sweet spot for that branch.

      The tier6 is looking fantastic as a whole, and the tier7 in its current state shits all over all the other tier7 CL/CAs, including the Belfast, though it doesn’t have the latter’s sheer utility in terms of consumables.

      Like

  3. Massive citadels,slow,poor (typical cruiser) armor. They will struggle. Russian cruisers have massive citadels too and they’re as large, but at least they’re FAST and have good guns. We’ll see

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s