WoWS Q&A – 12th July 2016

First part is a translated Chinese Q&A, so take it with a grain of salt. Source: Horizonwalker, NA.

Developers have regretted their decision of not implementing submarines. Right now they are looking for a way to introduce submarines to the game, however everything is uncertain at this point.

Developer Ev1n denied this and said that submarines won’t come. Translation mistake.

-German tier X battleship’s guns are still subject to change, in other words, they may change them to 406mm gun instead of 420mm.

-If everything goes okay, German battleships will hit the ST in patch 5.9 and release in patch 5.10.

-They may buff US CV’s fighters.

-They are not going to overhaul the economical system in game right now, but they may indroduce spotting damage (with earning) in the future, and they are still aiming to improve high tier economy.

-Dunkirk will be released this year.

-It is more fair to have a +/-1 MM, however this will make game less fun, so if you are looking for more balanced games, go play ranks. (eh, but there is no rank mode in Chinese server :P) In the distant futue, if the game is mature enough and have much more players by then, they will consider +/-1 MM.

-The problem of Tone is complicate. They will release the Tone after they develop a new mechanism for aircraft cruisers.

-Kitakami is the only ship that deals more damage to allies than enemies, therefore they removed it from live server. It may become a reward for skilled players in the future.

-Apparently, second Japanese DD branch has more priority than US CL branch.

-The goal of their development, is to add every famous WW1/WWII ship into the game, thus German carrier Graf Zeppelin will be in the game, not this year though.

Second Q&A (From Carnotzet, EU):

1a. Are German BB’s still planned to be released during Gamescom ?

A. At the earliest, they will go into production-testing in the next update. After that, we’ll see.

1b. Will Flint remain the final reward during for all seasons or will it change at some point ?

A. In the short-term (two to three seasons), the final reward will remain Flint.

1c. If I recall, bastions are equipped with 40.6 cm SK C/34 canons, right ? Are they the same as the upcoming German BB’s ? And will their characteristics change along those of the H-class guns (if changes are made to them, that is) ?

A. Bastion cannons characteristics are set solely on balance reasons, without them being tied to other weapons.

1d. In reference to your (or was it you?) last statement about the fate of Cleveland, some players started to fear that the US light cruiser branch was abandoned and that we should not expect it anytime soon. Or could you build one without Cleveland ?

A. No, we haven’t abandoned it. We have the desire to clean up cruiser lines and generally work some more on the existing lines (maybe add a new branch, adjust the tier of a ship, etc.). However, we’re currently not working on this since we have quite a lot of work with the next few updates.

1e. When you released the Soviet cruisers, there were high expectations for the top ship, Moskva, in regards to how similar ships would fare in the game. Did she meet your expectations ? And will you add Stalingrad or Alaska ?

A. Moskva is a good ship. I can’t comment on unreleased new ships.

1f. I remember developers promised to release four new branches this year. Currently, only one has been released, one is soon to be released, and about the remaining two, we haven’t heard a word. Do you intend to keep it a secret for long or will you tell us to wait and see ?

A. In a video, we promised two lines. As far as I can remember, JamesWhite said on a stream that there may be 3 or 4.

1g. Are you happy with the ramming mechanics ? Logically speaking, it doesn’t make much sense.

A. Yes, we are happy with it. We could make it more complex but it is very low on the priority list.


21 thoughts on “WoWS Q&A – 12th July 2016

  1. Hmmmm im still a bit more to the no side of introducing submarines, Either most tiers gonna be slow and boring or it’s gonna be Overpowered. Wonder why they suddenly regretted it though. (Found some interessting designs?)


  2. I’d like to see how they implement the submarines. The submersible should be able to go faster above the water and sink once they are spotted. The best way to counter them would be by using destroyers, light cruisers or hydroplanes to drop depth charges. Also the main spotters for submarines would be destroyers. I don’t know, there seems to be enough possibilities to make submarines a class for experienced and skilled players (Probably one per battle?).


    1. It would be fun to use Depth charges (see those huge explosions as you trot along :D).

      It all depends on how they decide to implement them, if they do that is. do not think they would limit the amount per match. all im worried about is how the lower tier would perform and depending how they implement the submarines, that they may come out a tad to strong.
      (Perhaps limit what tier they would be on? like tier 5-6 +)


      1. Yeah like the Type VII german U-boat, 16-20 knots surfaced and 6-8 knots submerged. doesn’t sound to fun just with the speed x)


      2. I like slow BBs :)
        so I would not mind to play a “slow” submerged sub
        or a “fast” surfaced sub ;)
        Just like with a BB it would force me to plan ahead more


  3. I’m pretty damn sure they won’t implement submarines. Russian Battleships, maybe (they’re dropping hints that they’re working on it) but subs are just no.

    That’ll be like back in the early WoT days when artillery was first implemented into the game.


    1. Realistically Subs might show up when most tech trees are done
      But remember that in a recent leak the name Gato appeared in WoWs files together with some other famous sub
      So who knows, maybe some kind of bot controlled subs with player DDs escort test is already ongoing…


  4. Yes bring on the submarines, would be a great addition and no they are not to slow, surfaced they are fast enough, and could have totally different starting areas than normal vessels. This would also provide the opportunity to remove the autoreload of Torps for most ships and change them to a consumable and move the Torp spamming weapon to the subs where it would actually belong. DDs and some Cruiser would take on their role of fighting them and protecting their BBs and CVs

    Hooray Graf Zeppelin :) and every famous ship

    Sounds that we won’t see german BBs then before September … oh well as long as they are well balanced like the Tirpitz I’ll be happy :)

    Kitakami reward for skilled players? Sounds more like reward for skilled players and no job&family playing all day 365 days a year …

    my 2 cents

    Liked by 1 person

    1. also subs could be in special game mode, you might not alwas have a DD fighting a sub while avoiding enemy cruisers. But I could imaging escort modes where some players have to protect BoT controlled BBs, carriers and convo, while other players in subs trying to get their torps in …

      just thinking out load aehmmm writing :)

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s