Supertest: CS-44 (Complete Stats)

CS-44. Initial paramaters:

Tier: MT-7, Polska, standard
HP: 1 100
Engine: 550 hp
Mass: 30,050 t
Maximum load: 31,50 t
Power-to-weight: 18,30 hp / t
Maximum speed / Reverse speed: 57 / -15 km / h
Hull turning speed: 36,0 °/s
Turret turning speed: 43,8 °/s
Terrain resistance values: 0,959 / 1,151 / 1,918
View range: 370 m
Radio range: 700 m

Hull armor: 140 / 50 / 30 mm
Turret armor: 150 / 80 / 50 mm

Gun: 100 mm armata wz. 49

Alpha Damage: 300 / 300 / 410
Penetration: 168 / 220 / 53 mm
Rate of fire: 5,214 rounds/minute
Damage per minute: 1 564,3
Reload time: 11,507 s
Accuracy at 100 m: 0,384
Aiming time: 2,01 s
Depression/Elevation: – 6 ° / + 15 °

Gun: 90 mm armata wz. 46

Alpha Damage: 240 / 240 / 320
Penetration: 160 / 202 / 45 mm

Gun: 90 mm armata wz. 39/44

Alpha Damage: 240 / 240 / 320
Penetration: 156 / 198 / 45 mm

Rounds in magazine: 40
Shell speed: 966 m/s

Guns/Ammo:

Crew: Commander, Driver, Gunner, Loader

Aim spread:

after firing: 4.315;
during turret rotation: 0.115;
while the vehicle is moving: 0.192;
during vehicle rotation: 0.192;
during turret rotation at maximum speed: 4.83;
at the maximum vehicle speed: 10.93;
at the maximum vehicle rotation speed: 6.9.

Camouflage Values:

stationary tank camouflage: 24.9%;
tank camouflage during motion: 18.6%;
stationary tank camouflage while shooting: 5.2%;
moving tank camouflage while shooting: 3.89%.

More pictures:

10 thoughts on “Supertest: CS-44 (Complete Stats)

    1. How is it a higher tier amx 40 again with all the stats it has? Its definitely faster than the duck and can pen stuff plus it doesnt even look like the duck so it’s already nothing like it, mediocre tier 7 med yes but not like the shit tier 4 light tank everyone knows

      1. ok, let us say this tank looks like what the Renault G1 would look like IF the French had realized their specifications for the G1 program were already outdated

    1. I would take a guess and say it is based on a concept, concepts are a “wonderfull” thing because they don’t need to represent something that can actualy be done, I would say they never developed the concept in proper detail (like at least making basic plans, let alone proper blueprints)
      2 good examples are the famous Panzerkampfwagen IX and X, they were never actually real plans but they still created a fake concept to confuse the Allies, those never went further than basic sketches and a sillhouette shape (actually somewhat similar shape with this CS-44)

      NOTE on Pz.IX/X: those were never intended to be real designs, but I guess we could argue they were still tank concepts

Leave a Reply