Second Update: Santa brings you credits

As I wrote last year, you can get a nice amount of credits (if you’ve researched most nations, or even better if you are a Senior Technical Engineer) by buying and selling discounted tanks you don’t need. A wise reminder by QuickyBaby, you can keep some of these for the upcoming wheeled vehicles or unresearched tech trees. Last year TAP reader Quaksen, posted this list which gives us some idea about the possible profits.

Therealisnes, checked this list and confirmed that these are the best vehicles to buy (most expensive). Thanks bro, my lazy ass just wasn’t up to this task ๐Ÿ˜ฆ

Quaksen, corrected my mistake of calling this list an erroneous one, since I actualy used the corrected version he made last year! Sorry Quaksen, my bad ๐Ÿ˜ฆ

Quaksen wrote in comments last year:

The highest value tanks are:
Tier II: France, H35 (4.200)
Tier III: USSR, SU-26 (53.000)
Tier IV: France, B1 (185.000)
Tier V: Japan, O-I Exp. (445.000)
Tier VI: USA, M4A3E2 Sherman Jumbo (975.000)
Tier VII: Japan, O-Ni (1.490.000)
Profit:
Tier II-V: 343.600
Tier VI: 292.500
Tier VII: 149.000
Total profit: 785.100

Advertisements

17 thoughts on “Second Update: Santa brings you credits

    1. Dear Theralisnes,

      I posted it because it has partial value. It gives you a sense of things I’m “talking” about. But you know the real/proper solution, just do the math, find the best candidates, and I’ll post it here and remove this list!

      Like

  1. Dear Therealisnes,

    last year someone in comments found errors on tier 2 & 3, (I think) where Quaksen forgot to subtract some values. All in all, this list is more than 90% correct, and now we know that these vehicles are the best choice. Sorry man, I’m just too tiered and lazy to do this, that’s why I used huge red font to tell readers that this is not 100% correct.

    Like

    1. There’s no need to ignore the math.
      The math is correct.
      You copy/pasted the corrected list.

      Now the only thing that isn’t correct.. is calling it erroneous and telling people to ignore the math, in the article.
      ๐Ÿ™‚

      Like

  2. I posted a list for last years event, it had a math mistake, which was corrected, and you even replied to the correct message back then.

    “Last year TAP reader Quaksen, posted this erroneous list”
    Why are you calling it an erroneous list, when the list is correct?… You copy/pasted the corrected list.

    So if you could correct the article, that would be great. The list was not erroneous.

    And as “therealisnes” said, it’s still correct for this year. No new tanks changed the highest value ones.

    Like

    1. Sorry Quaksen, my bad! I saw your line:”Small problem, lol.. I forgot to half the value of the tier 2-5″ and figured it’s still erroneous. Please accept my apologizes, I will correct it immediately.

      Thank you once again for making this list!

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Yeah, I posted that in the fixing message I believe ๐Ÿ™‚
        The list you have posted is the correct one – I went and checked the tanks again, and didn’t find any new ones, just like “therealisnes” found out.

        Accepted! You didn’t have to include it as part of the article though! ๐Ÿ™‚

        and as you know by now, still reading TAP, very regularly, even if I don’t comment much.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.