Supertest: IS-3A (Complete Stats)

http://rykoszet.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/supertest-IS3A-autoreloader_EN-e1536580071553.png

IS-3A (HT-8, USSR). Parameters:

Tier: HT-8, USSR
HP: 1 550
Engine: 520 hp
Mass: 49 t
Maximum load: 53,56 t
Power-to-weight: 10,61 hp / t
Max speed/Min speed: 40 / -15 km / h
Hull turning speed: 26 °/s
Turret turning speed: 22,9 °/s
Terrain resistance values: 0,959 / 1,151 / 2,014
View range: 350 m
Radio range: 720 m

Hull armor: 110 / 90 / 60 mm
Turret armor: 249 / 172 / 100 mm

Gun: 122 mm D-25TA

Alpha Damage: 390 / 390 / 530
Penetration: 221 / 270 / 61
Rate of fire: 10,734 rounds/minute
Damage per minute: 1 992
Rounds in magazine: 3 units
Reload time between rounds: 3,0 s
Reload time (magazine/projectile/number of rounds): 44,05 s / 3 s / 3
Time of automatic reloading of a shell: 12 / 15 / 18 s

Accuracy at 100 m: 0,441
Aiming time: 2,88 s
Depression/Elevation: -5 / +19

31 thoughts on “Supertest: IS-3A (Complete Stats)

    1. why don\’t they give this stats to t34? the answer : because reason because rasha da and because fuck you…..

  1. If they keep the \’flipped\’ reload times then this tank will be the new Defender, except even worse. So long, paper armor meds.

  2. Should use a 100mm. Or even the 107. Still it doesn\’t scare me like a 100KPH Panhard with an auto 105mm and built in aimbot.

  3. Should use a 100mm. Or even the 107. Still it doesn\’t scare me like a 100KPH Panhard with an auto 105mm and built in aimbot.

  4. Should use a 100mm. Or even the 107. Still it doesn\’t scare me like a 100KPH Panhard with an auto 105mm and built in aimbot.

  5. Should use a 100mm. Or even the 107. Still it doesn\’t scare me like a 100KPH Panhard with an auto 105mm and built in aimbot.

  6. Should use a 100mm. Or even the 107. Still it doesn\’t scare me like a 100KPH Panhard with an auto 105mm and built in aimbot.

  7. Should use a 100mm. Or even the 107. Still it doesn\’t scare me like a 100KPH Panhard with an auto 105mm and built in aimbot.

  8. Should use a 100mm. Or even the 107. Still it doesn\’t scare me like a 100KPH Panhard with an auto 105mm and built in aimbot.

  9. Should use a 100mm. Or even the 107. Still it doesn\’t scare me like a 100KPH Panhard with an auto 105mm and built in aimbot.

  10. Should use a 100mm. Or even the 107. Still it doesn\’t scare me like a 100KPH Panhard with an auto 105mm and built in aimbot.

  11. Should use a 100mm. Or even the 107. Still it doesn\’t scare me like a 100KPH Panhard with an auto 105mm and built in aimbot.

  12. Should use a 100mm. Or even the 107. Still it doesn\’t scare me like a 100KPH Panhard with an auto 105mm and built in aimbot.

  13. Should use a 100mm. Or even the 107. Still it doesn\’t scare me like a 100KPH Panhard with an auto 105mm and built in aimbot.

  14. Should use a 100mm. Or even the 107. Still it doesn\’t scare me like a 100KPH Panhard with an auto 105mm and built in aimbot.

  15. Should use a 100mm. Or even the 107. Still it doesn\’t scare me like a 100KPH Panhard with an auto 105mm and built in aimbot.

  16. Should use a 100mm. Or even the 107. Still it doesn\’t scare me like a 100KPH Panhard with an auto 105mm and built in aimbot.

  17. Should use a 100mm. Or even the 107. Still it doesn\’t scare me like a 100KPH Panhard with an auto 105mm and built in aimbot.

  18. Should use a 100mm. Or even the 107. Still it doesn\’t scare me like a 100KPH Panhard with an auto 105mm and built in aimbot.

  19. Should use a 100mm. Or even the 107. Still it doesn\’t scare me like a 100KPH Panhard with an auto 105mm and built in aimbot.

  20. The only issue I have with this rework is the first shot being the fastest to reload, it should\’ve been the opposite (18/15/12) or a fixed value for all three (e.g. 14/14/14). As it is, there\’s a chance to do an average of 1560 damage (3+1 shots) in roughly 18 seconds, which is ridiculous.

  21. ahahahahahaha that\’s ridiculous WG are you retard or what? buff some german tanks(who real need it) and stop that stupids OP russian for make easy money with retard wallet player

Leave a Reply