9.20 Armor Changes: Bat.-Châtillon 25 t, Churchill III, Т-44-85, SU-14-1, Pz.Kpfw. 38H 735 (f), Matilda Black Prince, T69

Bat.-Châtillon 25 t:

Churchill III:

T-44-85:

SU-14-1:

Pz.Kpfw. 38H 735 (f):

Matilda Black Prince:

T69:

Object 140:

Enjoy.

Advertisements

31 thoughts on “9.20 Armor Changes: Bat.-Châtillon 25 t, Churchill III, Т-44-85, SU-14-1, Pz.Kpfw. 38H 735 (f), Matilda Black Prince, T69

    1. This is how it’s meant to be, the old hitbox model was incorrect. The other 2 Matildas in the game have the same configuration on tanks.gg, but they don’t have the spaced armor, which looks to be around 15mm thick. There should be well-angled 55mm plates behind the spaced armor.

      Like

  1. lol at t69 and its 1000000 different armor values on turret.

    Also, 140 turret buff not good enough, give it spaced armor all around…

    Like

  2. Wargaming wtf – all this armour-simplification sucks! the drivers hatch of the T44 gone – the spaced armour and details of the Churchill III gone! the spaced armour of the BC gone! the Pz28 lost all its weakspots …. gg wp
    tracks are being added randomly and dont allways count as spaced armour – look at the PzIVA for example or ALL of the Tiger I vechicles …
    i just dont get it

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I can only concur! weakspots, based on the tank-topography (MG-ports, drivers hatches, …) seem to be too much of a mystery for Joe Random it seems. so lets just get rid of them, prem-ammo can still handle the rest. why on earth would some weakspots like MG-ports (also on super-heavy tanks like VK 100.00 P and the like) be such a problem? 90% of the people wouldn’t shoot them anyway, I bet.

      for the Object 140 buff: sure thing. one of the VERY few drawbacks of that tank has to be removed, because its WR was utterly lacking in the past. oh wait …
      now even 150mm guns will have a hard time of reaching the very very small part of the 45mm roof-armor, that you can see frontally. great job! *fp*

      Liked by 1 person

      1. If you check server stats you will see that 140 is actually underperforming at the moment. But that’s because of the retarded super heavy corridor meta and I’m not too sure about the buff. Doesn’t seem to be that bad tho

        Like

  3. Something’s really wrong with this game when they are buffing armor of all tanks and the battles are shorter and shorter.

    Like

  4. i really fucking despise that wg is buffing the 140 its already an insanely powerful tank. it didnt need buffed if anything it needed nerfed a bit…

    Liked by 1 person

      1. Actually, it’s just an unreleased (At least, to my knowledge) tier 7 premium MT. You can still see it in the tech tree on tanks.gg. They trailed it a while ago, but found it was quite weak and unremarkable. Guess they’re giving it another shot.

        Like

  5. So storage boxes on russian tanks are considered spaced armor with absurd thickness and range-values. But the BatChat’s storage boxes are considered internal space. GG WG, GG.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s