122 TM. Statistics with crew at 100%:
Tier: MT-8, China, premium
HP: 1 500
Engine: 580 hp
Mass: 37,50 t
Maximum load: 39,0 t
Power-to-weight: 15,47 hp / t
Max speed / Reverse speed: 55 / β 15 km / h
Hull turning speed: 41,72 Β°/s
Turret turning speed: 31,29 Β°/s
Terrain resistance values: β / β / β
View range: 370 m
Radio range: 782 m
Hull armor: 135 / 80 / 50 mm
Turret armor: 280 / 140 / 70 mm
Gun: 120 mm TG
Alpha Damage: 400 / 400 / 515
Penetration: 233 / 299 / 62 mm
Rate of fire: 3,91 rounds/minute
Damage per minute: 1 565
Reload time: 15,34 s
Accuracy at 100 m: 0,32
Aiming time: 1,92 s
Depression/Elevation: -8 Β° / +15 Β°
Rounds in magazine: 30 rounds.
Crew – 4 members: Commander, Driver, Gunner and Loader.
Camouflage values:
- Camo of the stationary vehicle: 15.9 / 3.02% (for the stationary vehicle / for the stationary vehicle after firing a shot);
- Camo of the vehicle during motion: 11.91 / 2.26% (for the moving vehicle / for the moving vehicle after firing a shot)
TBH, this is like a Tier VIII TD gun (good pene, good alpha, good accuracy but long reload, blah blah blah)…
The irony of this tank is high for wargaming since it was to have a smooth bore gun and atgms
The ATGM on the tank model is nothing more than a cosmetic thing. They will not have any functional use.
I would rather WG just leave them off of the model. They match the game just as much as the Valkyria Chronicles tanks they cut from the Western release. So if one doesn’t fit, neither does the other.
UFP appears to be 135mm at 58~60 degrees, which will provide some 225~235mm of protection vs AP and 255~270mm of protection vs HEAT.
If we’re just going to start implementing cold-war era MBT’s as tier 8 Christmas bag tanks, can we get the MBT-70, too? It’s already in Blitz as a tier 9 and was found to be somewhat weak there.