Supertest: 🇨🇿 Vz. 55 – Changed Stats

Vz. 55. Statistics with crew at 100%:

Autoloader gun: 130 mm vs. 54 2A

Rate of fire: 4,53   4,62 rounds/minute
Damage per minute: 2 221   2 264
Damage per minute with HE shells:   2 901   2 957
Reload time between autoloader rounds: 2,5 s   2,0 s
Aiming time: 2,97 s   2,78 s

Cyclic gun: 130 mm vs. 54

Accuracy at 100 m: 0,38   0,36
Aiming time: 2,68 s   2,49 s

12 thoughts on “Supertest: 🇨🇿 Vz. 55 – Changed Stats

  1. It’d be awesome if the premium had the choice between autoloader and cyclic.

    1. Unless the switching is exclusive to the Tier 10 (see CS-63 with turbo), I believe this will be the line’s gimmick starting with Tier 8, so the premium should be included too.

      Never underestimate WG Minsk though, they work in mysterious ways.

  2. What? -980 from just 2 sec?? No way, this should be only adjustment leve i hope

      1. You take 880 in 2.7 from the Kranvagn and it has a spare shell.
        You take 1470 and 1600 dmg from the rest of heavy autoloaders.
        Lo and behold, this thing is forbidden from having good intraclip (980 potential dmg and slower reload than T57).
        “But,but,but 2s intraclip is too much pls nerf” bet you were on top of the bandwagon that wanted the Rinoceronte nerfed to oblivion. smh

        1. 880 is not 980 and the difference between 2.7 sec and 2 sec is also massive. As bourrasque showed, a two round autoloader with a 2 sec interclip is incredibly powerful because often times you can get those out and get back into cover before the enemy has a chance to react, as long as you have mobility, and VZ is a pretty mobile heavy. Another comparison, the STII with its 2 round auto(re)loader has a 5 second interclip when firing one by one with 440 alpha AND the STII is incredibly slow. The Rhino has a 4 sec interclip for 490.

          As for T57 and 50B, they don’t have reliable armor. This tank looks to have at least a reliable turret though we won’t know for sure until the armor model is released. It all depends on the armor profile, if the VZ has a reliable turret then the 2 sec interclip is too good. If it doesn’t have reliable armor then the 2 sec would be justified.

          During the Rhino supertest, I didn’t pay much attention to its development so I never commented on it anywhere, however, the Rhino is currently my favorite heavy tank. It could use a slight mobility buff but otherwise I love the combination of accuracy, aim time, shell velocity and the huge mag potential. I plan on getting the VZ as well since I have all the tier 10 autoloading heavies in the game, but I’m fine with a balanced tank as long as it provides unique gameplay, and a 2 round autoloader will do that imo.

  3. finally a tank worth to grind, if they nerf it to hell like the Rino, than no reason to grind it

  4. Wow… Just wow. How do they think this tank needs a buff when they absolutely killed the Rinoceronte. When the rino requires more skill to play. When the rino has worse armor. How can they buff this already powerful tank.

  5. Because there is more CZ players too keep happy than Italian pastas.

  6. with 1800 HP and 2200 dpm that thing is a farcry from competitive…

Comments are closed.