Update 1.11: 🇬🇧 GSOR 1008 – Changed Stats

Some nerfs were rolled back.
https://ru-wotp.wgcdn.co/static/5.6.2_896aed/wotp_static/img/core/frontend/scss/common/components/widgets/content-tank/img/italy.png GSOR 1008. Statistics with crew at 100%:

Max speed / Reverse speed: 55 / -12 km / h   60 / -17 km / h
View range: 350 m   370 m

Gun: 105 mm AT Gun L7A1
Aiming time: 2,4 s   2,21 s

11 thoughts on “Update 1.11: 🇬🇧 GSOR 1008 – Changed Stats

  1. So Wg created a niche for a tier 8 premium assault TD when they nerfed Skorp G, and didn’t tell anyone.
    This looks like it’s costly replacement.

    1. Pardon me. When and more importantly how did this nerf to the Skorpion G happen? Any sources to that statement?

          1. I knew it would be Claus. He is extremely paranoid.
            I like him, but he doesnt understand some fundamental game mechanics.
            But I guess he is just pretending for his special contend niche.

            1. Everyone who has it since release can tell you that skorp had laser accurate gun that rarely missed its shots.
              Stealth nerf is what it’s called. That one of the reasons why soft stats exist.

              1. Get some old replays then and prove it. Could not be that hard. or compare it directly to the SU-130.
                Claus should deliver some evidence to convince people, not some strange feelings.
                My Skorp plays the same as always. It always had those strange misses. But back in the day nobody cared, because nobody expected to hit every shot right in the center. On top of that it was never able to hit targets on the move.
                Today everyone is expecting literal on point accuracy in every situation, partly because some much more OP tanks appeard since then.
                Remember Skorp was one of the first of the new Premuim tanks generation.
                Btw Claus made some false statements in his video, vor example KV-2 hitting 9/10 shots right in the center, thats just not true.

                1. Why should I have replays from that time? Even if I had replays I would not be able to play them.
                  And what would it prove? Nothing. You could always say that these were just lucky games.
                  That’s the problem with Stealth nerfs. You can’t prove that they happened. A hard proof only WG could provide to us by letting us look into the numbers.
                  Believe what you want to believe, it’s not as if I would care…

                  1. Oh you dont care, thats why you answerd, ok.
                    My point still stands, you can proove it if you want, not you in particular, but some content creator. All you need is data, much data, not a single battle.
                    You can download all old versions of wot to view old replays, its hard work, but it is possible.
                    So as long as nobody comes with some data, we only have feelings.

  2. This one is misleading. It is not the prenerfed version that was on the supertest first. But they rolled back some of the nerfs. Please be more accurate. Thanks.

Leave a Reply