Supertest: 🇫🇷 Lorraine 50 t

~ Sebastianul

In update 1.9.1, this vehicle will arrive to supertest:

Lorraine 50 t. Initial parameters:
Tier: HT-9, France, special
HP: 1 900
Engine: 980 hp
Mass: 50,00 t
Maximum load: 53,00 t
Power-to-weight: 19,60 hp / t
Max speed/ reverse speed: 50 / -15 km / h
Hull turning speed: 30,00 °/s
Turret turning speed: 27,10 °/s
Terrain resistance values: 1,055 / 1,151 / 2,014
View range: 380 m
Radio range: 750 m

Hull armor: 155 / 60 / 40 mm
Turret armor: 300 / 80 / 40 mm

Gun: 120 mm D. 1203 P

Alpha Damage: 400 / 400 / 515
Penetration: 264 / 308 / 65 mm
Rate of fire: 4,171 rounds/minute
Damage per minute: 1 668,60
Reload time: 14,384 s
Accuracy at 100 m: 0,384
Aiming time: 2,88 s
Depression/Elevation: -10 ° / + — °
Shell speed: 1 067 m/s

Gun/Ammo:

Crew – 4 members: Commander, Driver, Gunner, Loader

Aim spread:

after firing: 2,877;
during turret rotation: 0.077;
while the vehicle is moving: 0.23;
during vehicle rotation: 0.23;
during turret rotation at maximum speed: 1.99;
at the maximum vehicle speed: 11.51;
at the maximum vehicle rotation speed: 6.90.

Camouflage Values:

stationary tank camouflage: 8.0%;
tank camouflage during motion: 4.0%;
stationary tank camouflage: 1.44%;
tank camouflage during motion: 0.72%.

More pictures:

25 thoughts on “Supertest: 🇫🇷 Lorraine 50 t”

  3. is that the TCB turret? I thought it was designed by A.M.X (usually linked to AMX projects, like the M4/50, 65t, etc) so why would it be “mounted” on a Lorraine design?

  4. Dammit wargaming you had one job it seems like this is fake as well as Armando said it make not a lot of sense for them to put the TCB turret on the Lorraine chassis’s since the project was AMX’s. The TOB turret is a bit more feasible but it would still be kinda fake ( another person who knows more history than I (andojil) therorized that it was technically possible to mount the TOB turret but who knows)

    Also it could be a new branch with the AMX 50 B TCB (conventional turret) at tier X and the French medium branch actually being implemented

  5. Clan Reward Tank or another Mission Reward Tank?
    yeah looks very nice, but …………….

    if its so ..
    ZERO interest to 99% of all players in WOT what a waste of recourses from WG

    Tier 9 Premiums
    or – suppose for Bonds which barely anyone has anywhere near enough for to get this, unless high level top team players Clan Wars … which are slow dying away anyways

    1. WG wants to keep the tryhards from leaving, otherwise no one else would bother with Clan Whores, Wanked and the other game modes majority of players don’t bother with.

      Instead of this vicious cycle of more and more prem rewards for the 1%, how about making non-random game modes more accessible for everyone who’s at least average? Is it too much trouble and effort?

          1. LOL I was betting someone would’ve dropped such an answer, they’ve become the new staple along with the “git gud” and “u need thicker skin” BS 😀

            But yeah, you are right. How the heck can I go on living without being good at an online videogame? Life sure is harsh… 🙁

            1. People can still be good at this game and have a life, y’know. They’re not mutually exclusive.

        2. I’m good enough of a player if WN8 1690 is good in your eyes? BUT not good enough for the Top Clans
          Sarcasm don’t help here btw?

          and yes I DO have a life from Mondays to Fridays its called WORK and a Wife whom I spend lots of time with
          ~ not a nothing cartoon Game that gives a Shit about me OR any of YOU

  6. Funny how this fake thing does not have the prominent cupolas the M4 51/54 have. Oh wait, this one’s a reward premium, not a techtree tank.

    1. The tech tree tank is literally better and one of the best tier 9 tanks overall.
      The dpm and bad gunhandling makes this tank almost useless, if they would put it into the game with those stats unchanged it would be one of the worst at its tier.

      1. We have plenty of Tier 9 premiums in the game – T-55A, AE Phase I, Char Futur, Object 777, Concept 1B, Kampfpanzer 50t, etc.

        Just because they do not have premium economy doesn’t mean they are not premium tanks (same crew swapping and elite-from-start status as “classic” premiums).

        1. They are literally called REWARD tanks not premium tanks…

  9. This could be a reward tank for the new season of Ranked Battles. Would be good actually, cause I am not interested in Ranked Battles, and neither am I interested in this tank.

  13. Every time I see that 300 number on the turret it pisses me off. 240-280 pen flies through it consistently… they should make it “350”

  14. So basically a better Lorr 40t hull with an AMX M4/49 turret without weak spots (cupollas). New reward for either next FL/StH or Ranked. Since hull-down spots are becoming rarer and rarer, this will be trash in most player’s hands since the norm now is to bum rush in front of the enemy and die. At least it’s not a retard-proof tank. Imagine getting a better version of the Obj 257 as a reward. All i’m saying is that ist’s not good, not bad but i could be worse.

  15. Same as AMX M4 51 but worse. That 60mm side armor hurts. It has pike nose (kind of) and it will not be immune to high pen shells. ROF hurts and gun handling is trash. Gun would be nice if it had higher caliber and 470/490/520 alpha dmg with all other stats the same, then tank would be decent for tier 9.
    Now – wouldn’t touch it with 3m long wooden stick.

Comments are closed.