Supertest: KV-4, ST-I, IS-4, T32 and T110E5 Changed Stats

~ Sebastianul

Second iteration of the Supertest.

KV-4:

Depression of the 122 mm D-25T gun increased from -6 ° to -8 ° (both turrets).

ST-I:

The reload time of the 122 mm M62-T2 gun was increased from 11.51 s to 12.18 s;
The rate of fire of the 122 mm M62-T2 gun changed from 5.22 to 4.93 rounds/minute.
The average damage per minute of the 122 mm M62-T2 gun changed from 2295 to 2168;
The average damage per minute of the 122 mm M62-T2 gun for HE shells changed from 2764 to 2612.

IS-4:

Changed the reload time of the 122 mm M62-T2 gun from 10.07 s to 11.03 s;
The rate of fire of the 122 mm M62-T2 gun changed from 5.96 to 5.44 rounds/minute;
The average damage per minute of the 122 mm M62-T2 gun changed from 2622 to 2394;
The average damage per minute of the 122 mm M62-T2 gun for HE shells changed from 3159 to 2884.

T32:

105 mm Gun T5E1 (for the top turret):

Gun reload time changed from 8.34 to 9.01 s;
The rate of fire changed from 7.19 to 6.66 rounds/minute;
The average damage per minute changed from 2302 to 2130;
The damage per minute for HE shells changed from 3021 to 2796.

T110E5:

Increased dispersion during movement from 0.14 m to 0.18 m;
Increased dispersion during hull rotation from 0.14 m to 0.18 m;
Increased dispersion at maximum vehicle speed from 5.18 m to 6.66 m;
Increased dispersion at maximum vehicle rotation speed from 4.38 m to 5.63 m;
Increased dispersion during turret rotation from 0.06 m to 0.08 m;
Increased dispersion during turret rotation at maximum speed from 2.00 to 2.67 m.

120 mm Gun M58:

Gun reload time increased from 8.44 to 9.59 s;
The rate of fire changed from 7.11 to 6.26 rounds/minute;
The average damage per minute changed from 2845 to 2503;
The average damage per minute for HE shells changed from 3662 to 3222.

22 thoughts on “Supertest: KV-4, ST-I, IS-4, T32 and T110E5 Changed Stats”

  2. Ah yes, we wouldn’t want to overbuff those garbage-tier vehicles, right? shakes head
    One step forward, two steps back.

  3. My God! I’m waiting for the Supertest changes on the German tanks :O WG will murder the stats!

  5. they just reverted all changes they made to E5, hopefully they just do it to see how testers would play current E5 because it seemed overbuffed with improved stats. Except even buffed it would be worse than super conq…
    Or maybe they’ll fix the tumor on the turret instead of buffing gun stats.

    1. or they can just test it ONLY vs Sconq and see that is the result…
      15 vs 15 , 3 vs3, 7 vs 7…..whatever….its same, WORSE IN ANY ASPECT

      thats just MISERABLE “balance”

        1. Are you crazy? Stronger that S.Conq????
          S.Conq has much better gun handling,turret armor,reload,gun depression..
          S.Conq vs E5.. S.Conq would OBLITERATE E5 even if E5 was buffed to its new stats.
          S.Conq: Dispersion at 100m: 0.32
          E5: Dispersion at 100m: 0.34
          S.Conq gun handling while moving: 0.12
          E5 (new stats): 0.14
          Dude you need brain

  6. Why did they reverted all the dpm buffs ?? What a stupid move.

  7. WG what the f*k are you even doing? Why just revert it all back? You always take 1 step forward and 2 steps back.. I know that WG is not reading this but still…

  8. OMFG . the only good thing about the e5 is its gun handling and they nerfed it . WARGAMING GEEZUS SELL WOT YOUR CLUELESS

  9. WHAT IN GOD’S NAME IS WG DOING??? Reverting buffs to bad tanks and further nerfing the E5??? This is even worse than when they removed the nerf to the 430U!

  10. 26 march, IS4 : Reload time reduced from 12,0 s to 10,5 s / 16 april : Changed the reload time of the 122 mm M62-T2 gun from 10.07 s to 11.03 s; WTF ?

  11. I’m dissapointed that WG reduce the buff on T32. It’s like “Oh noo. If we buff T32, no one gonna play our baby IS-3 and KV-4. Nerf them back. Screw non russian tank”

  12. I think WG is doing a min/max test. The first iteration was buffed, the second iteration was nerfed. The final result will hopefully be somewhere in between. I do not know why this would be necessary, as general opinion is these tanks are underpowered, but I prefer this idea over thinking the E5’s stats will be made worse than what they are currently.

  13. Seeing these changes I think even after “buffs” t32 and e5 will still be at the lower edge of competitiveness. That means they will very soon again be completely power crept. Sad… As I think the whole murican tech tree sucks. Apart from arty and patton. Very sad…

    1. I agree. The E3 ist quite okay but E4 for example is one driving weakspot. The whole american tree feels outdated with only very few competitive tanks. Stuck in 2015, very good back then but nowadays most tanks are victims of the powercreep.

      1. One thing the US tree will always have is the E3 and the best arty in the game the M53/55.

        Unless WG suddenly makes tier 11 a thing while adding the T58 Heavy(155mm autoloader) then the US line is going to remain a relic just like most of the German tree.

  14. I am really also pissed off about the ST-I – i loved that tank and was rly good at it even witj the horrendous gun handling.

    Then the HD rework came and WG thought ” we need to nerf ONE tank in the russian tech tree so that we dont look too bias” – and they took the ST I and gave it a turret cupola nerf that even t8 lights can pen now – at the same time 430Unholy appears.

    And now when they finally buff the handling and gun stats they revert it back to the abyss again….

Comments are closed.